99 Out of 100 Questions
I often see videos on youtube regarding the "new world order" or the supposed globalists plans to erase national and cultural boundaries.
Often people from the more conservative end of the artificial political spectrum claim that the government or "the left" want to eliminate national sovereignty, which is partially true, though I don't believe most modern nations have ever had complete national sovereignty. I believe the power elite have created elaborate and misleading systems of thought to give the impression that we DO have some say, when in fact, for the most part we don't.
What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions,....money.
The global elite wouldn't be pushing for a global system unless there is some financial benefit to them. Erasing national and cultural boundaries makes it easier for them to; do business on a global scale, to place large groups of people wherever they want, to create political movements and to eliminate political movements. It makes it easier for them to develop the industrial capacity of backward countries if they can move in capable, industrious, populations without having to deal with backlash from native populations.
There are examples of this in history, for example Guyana. Guyana has tremendous mineral wealth and yet it has been very difficult for corporations to get anyone to move in the area and mine the minerals. Bringing in workers costs quite a bit of money, not only that they have to build the infrastructure, roads, water, sewage and all with NO tax base.
So what I'm thinking is that the "global power elite" want to create a world that makes it easier for them to exploit resources and develop industrial capacity at the cheapest price possible, with the least amount of trouble from workers and populations.
They seem to prefer populations that are more easily programmable, not just controllable. Populations whose genetics makes it easier for the elite to influence, guide, and control their minds yet, with the ability behave as if they are not under control. Populations that can make it seem as if their behavior stems from their own ideas, thoughts, and experiences. Flexible people that can change roles and act according to what is needed at that particular place and time.
This is why it appears to me that the elite aren't completely human.
Often people from the more conservative end of the artificial political spectrum claim that the government or "the left" want to eliminate national sovereignty, which is partially true, though I don't believe most modern nations have ever had complete national sovereignty. I believe the power elite have created elaborate and misleading systems of thought to give the impression that we DO have some say, when in fact, for the most part we don't.
What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions,....money.
The global elite wouldn't be pushing for a global system unless there is some financial benefit to them. Erasing national and cultural boundaries makes it easier for them to; do business on a global scale, to place large groups of people wherever they want, to create political movements and to eliminate political movements. It makes it easier for them to develop the industrial capacity of backward countries if they can move in capable, industrious, populations without having to deal with backlash from native populations.
There are examples of this in history, for example Guyana. Guyana has tremendous mineral wealth and yet it has been very difficult for corporations to get anyone to move in the area and mine the minerals. Bringing in workers costs quite a bit of money, not only that they have to build the infrastructure, roads, water, sewage and all with NO tax base.
So what I'm thinking is that the "global power elite" want to create a world that makes it easier for them to exploit resources and develop industrial capacity at the cheapest price possible, with the least amount of trouble from workers and populations.
They seem to prefer populations that are more easily programmable, not just controllable. Populations whose genetics makes it easier for the elite to influence, guide, and control their minds yet, with the ability behave as if they are not under control. Populations that can make it seem as if their behavior stems from their own ideas, thoughts, and experiences. Flexible people that can change roles and act according to what is needed at that particular place and time.
This is why it appears to me that the elite aren't completely human.
Comments
Post a Comment